Score 350 or more
Audit required
The statements must be audited. Nothing else satisfies the Act, and no arrangement of the compilation changes that.
We refer you to an auditor
Companies, close corporations & trusts · Centurion, Gauteng
Compilations, independent reviews, accounting and tax. Prepared under IFRS for SMEs or full IFRS, and checked against a fixed schedule of tie-outs before anything is issued.
Said plainly: we will tell you which engagement you actually need, at the first conversation. If that turns out to be an audit, we are not a Registered Auditor, and we will refer you to one we trust.
Before anything else
Plenty of companies are told they need an audit when they do not. What you need follows from your public interest score under Regulation 26(2) of the Companies Act, and from who holds your shares. Here is the whole logic, in three cases.
Score 350 or more
The statements must be audited. Nothing else satisfies the Act, and no arrangement of the compilation changes that.
We refer you to an auditor
Score 100 to 349
Compiled internally, by your own staff, the statements must be audited. Compiled independently, by a firm like this one, an independent review is enough.
We compile, or we review
Score below 100
An independent review, unless every holder of a beneficial interest in your shares is also a director. That is the section 30(2A) test. Meet it and a compilation on its own is sufficient.
Squarely our work
One line we do not cross. Where a review is compulsory, we cannot both compile your statements and review them. That is self-review under Regulation 29(5): a hard stop, not a risk to be managed with safeguards. If you need both, one of them goes to another firm, and we will say which at the outset.
Work out where you sit, in about a minute.
Check your scoreFour things, done properly
A deliberately narrow practice. Everything below is work this firm may perform and does perform. Anything outside it gets referred rather than stretched to fit.
01
ISRS 4410 · IFRS for SMEs or full IFRS
Your trial balance becomes a complete, properly disclosed set of statements: primary statements, notes, the directors' report, and a tax computation that reconciles to the books.
02
ISRE 2400 (Revised) · Practice Note 3 of 2022
Where your public interest score calls for a review rather than an audit, this is the engagement. Limited assurance, expressed as a conclusion, with a file that supports it.
03
Bookkeeping through to trial balance
Records kept so that year end is an assembly job rather than a reconstruction. Bank, sales, purchases and payroll captured monthly, reconciled monthly, reportable at any point in the year.
04
Income Tax Act · VAT Act · SARS eFiling
Company tax computations that reconcile to the trial balance in every column, plus the returns and elections that follow from them.
How the work runs
Anyone can produce a set of statements that looks finished. The question is what was done to it before it was called finished. Here that is a fixed sequence, and it is the same for a client's file as for this firm's own.
Public interest score, the section 30(2A) test, independence, FICA. We establish that we may do the work, and that it is the right work, before quoting on it.
An engagement letter and standard terms setting out what is included, what is expressly excluded, and what we need from you. The fee is fixed before work starts.
Your trial balance drives every statement and note through a mapped chart of accounts. No number is entered twice, which removes the most common way a set of statements goes wrong.
A schedule of tie-outs must all pass before issue: every statement and note re-cast in both columns, comparatives agreed, tax reconciled to the trial balance, zero formula errors.
The file is read a second time by someone looking for the defect rather than for confirmation. Every review point is answered in writing, including the ones we disagree with, and why.
Signed statements, the working file, the representation letter and the checklist stay on record, so next year starts from evidence rather than from memory.
Where the speed comes from
Most of what makes a set of statements wrong is mechanical. A number captured twice. A total that stopped casting three edits ago. A comparative that no longer agrees to what was signed last year. That is work a machine does better than a person, and here it is done by one.
We use AI through the whole file: drafting from your trial balance, working the disclosure checklist line by line, running the public interest score and the acceptance calculations, and reading the finished file back looking for the break. It is why a set of statements takes days rather than weeks, and it is a large part of why the fee scale sits where it does.
What it does not do is sign. The framework, the estimates, the going concern conclusion, whether this firm may take the engagement at all. Every one of those is a judgement made by a Chartered Accountant (SA), who is professionally responsible for it and whose name is on the report. The machine assembles and checks. A person decides and answers for it.
Never invent a number. An estimate you made up is indistinguishable from a real one once it is in the cell.Hard rule one · Curve Capital compilation runbook
Fees
Fees come off a sliding scale applied to your size and the years involved, and are fixed in the engagement letter before any work begins. You will not receive an invoice for a number you have not already agreed.
Where the scale sits. A straightforward year is priced as one because it is genuinely quicker here: the records and the statements come out of one automated pipeline instead of being rebuilt by hand at year end. You are paying for the judgement and the review, not for somebody retyping your trial balance.
Groups and consolidations are not excluded. A consolidation is materially more work than a single set of statements and is priced accordingly, but it is work we do. Ask, and it gets quoted like anything else, before it starts.
Ask for a quoteAbout
Curve Capital exists to do a narrow set of things for South African companies, close corporations and trusts: keep the records, compile the statements, review them where a review is required and this firm may perform it, and get the tax right. Not to be a full-service firm, and not to grow into one.
That narrowness is what makes the standard of checking possible. A compilation here passes a fixed schedule of tie-outs before it is issued, then a second read by someone trying to break it. The firm's own annual financial statements come out of exactly the same pipeline as a client's, which is a fair test of whether we believe in it.
The practice is led by Rynhard van Maarleveld CA(SA), who signs every engagement letter, compilation report and review report in the registered name of the company.
He studied accounting at the University of Pretoria, taking a BCom in Accounting, then Honours and CTA. He served articles at PwC in Johannesburg and qualified as a Chartered Accountant after three years, spent time on secondment to PwC in the United States, and stayed on for close to two years as a manager in the Johannesburg practice.
He then moved into industry rather than up the firm: four years as Financial Manager of a listed company, from October 2021 to December 2025, and a chief financial officer role in the technology sector since then. That work has covered construction, mining, manufacturing and technology.
This is the part that matters for your file. He has spent years on the other side of the desk, answering for a set of statements to auditors, to a board and to a lender. It shows in how they get prepared.
Contact
The fastest useful conversation starts with three things: your last signed financial statements, your current trial balance, and your turnover, employee count and shareholders. That is enough to score you and tell you which engagement you actually need.
If it turns out you need an audit, we will say so in the first reply and point you to a Registered Auditor. It costs you nothing to find out.